BLOGS

Neil Rubin

On The Other Hand

Editor — exploring modern Jewry

Deplorable Catholic Pardon

Until now, Pope Benedict XVI has shown himself to be a warm partner in interfaith dialogue in word and deed. So one can only greet with profound dismay his pardon of the United Kingdom’s Bishop Richard Williamson. The British Church leader and three other ex-communicated Catholic leaders were brought back into the fold on Saturday, Jan. 24. They are members of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X, or SSPX. Their group rejects the reforms of the famous 1965 Vatican II Council. Among other things, that landmark doctrine called for the formal removal of anti-Semitism from the Church.

That would be bad enough. But Williamson – I won’t give him his religious courtesy title because he cannot, in my book, be a religious person—last year publicly declared that no more than 300,000 Jews were killed in the Holocaust and that there were no gas chambers.

Part of the response: In addition to the expected slew of critical press releases from Jewish groups, Israel’s Chief rabbis just broke relations with the Vatican and canceled participation in a scheduled March meeting in Rome with the pope’s Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.

The only good news is that our shock and revulsion does not stand alone. In fact, Dutch bishops have called their British colleague’s remarks “disrespectful and idiotic.” Likewise, Germany’s Cardinal Walter Kasper, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations With the Jews, has said, “Such gibberish is unacceptable.”

Meanwhile, the Pope is scrambling to do some damage control, according to the JTA Wire Service. In his Wednesday prayer at his public audience, he said, “While I renew with affection the expression of my full and unquestionable solidarity with our [Jewish] brothers, I hope the memory of the Shoah will induce humanity to reflect on the unpredictable power of hate when it conquers the heart of man.” For good measure, a front-page editorial in the official Vatican newspaper in its Monday-Tuesday edition called Williamson’s statements “unacceptable.” Then Bishop Bernard Fellay, the superior-general of the SSPX, publicly disavowed statements by Williamson that denied the Holocaust and barred Williamson from speaking further on the issue.

You know what? It’s not good enough. If an important Jewish leader declared, “Jesus had it coming to him for challenging the rabbis of his day,” we Jews would quickly denounce that person and never give him or her an important position again. Not only that, but as sure you can bet that I’ll eat chicken soup at Shabbat dinner, that rabbi would be making a public apology within a day or two.

Frankly, this is a moment of disgrace for the Vatican. After 18 plus centuries of anti-Jewish Church-inspired persecution, it is abominable to become an apologist for a Christian theologian who questions humanity’s most documented crime and then does not seek to apologize.

Look, I’m more than aware about the dangers in lecturing other religious leaders about their conduct within their faith. But for we Jews– and I’d think all caring people—this is far more than an internal Church matter. It is about how the Church chooses to position itself publicly on the most sensitive of concerns.

Until now, Pope Benedict has had good marks in the always emotional sphere of Catholic-Jewish ties. He has visited a synagogue in his native Germany and received Jewish audiences in Rome. Prior to assuming the papacy, he was a behind-the-scenes positive force in Pope John Paul II’s remarkable outreach to Jews.

So one must wonder what constituency Pope Benedict sought to ameliorate in this recent decision – and why it would be worthy of a world leader’s passing thought.

 

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 01/30/09 at 02:18 PM

rss feed
{weblog_name} - Deplorable Catholic Pardonrss feed
Comments (3)

Comments

WOW! you really put it to him! Couldn’t have said it better myself. Excellent response to the whole scenario around this issue. The Catholic Church has a responsibilty to denounce Williamson. Otherwise, there is reason to question these church leaders true colors and intentions for sincere friendship, reconcilation and goodwill.

Also, do me a favor and tell Phil Jacobs I made a typing error on the first line of my response to his article. Left out the word “not”  Thanks.

Shabbat Shalom,
Barb Bloom

Posted by Barbara Ann Fennell Bloom on 01/30/09 at 05:29 PM

Call it what you may John. But it’s wrong, wrong, wrong.

Posted by Baffled on 01/30/09 at 05:16 PM

Neil… please let me set the record straight - at least from my perspective… what Benedict did was to revoke the excommunication of 4 bishops who had been ordained by a renegade bishop, Marcel LeFebre, in an effort to bring back into the Catholic Church those members of the St. Pius X society, who are priests and bishops who disagreed with the decisions of Vatican II… It was a general gesture and part of Benedict’s outreach to several disaffected groups who did not want to see the Catholic Church changed to what it generally is today. This gesture to the Pius X society was I believe intended to express it’s members a “peace offering” in the disagreement with The Vatican… here is what the Vatican Press office stated:
VATICAN CITY, 28 JAN 2009 (VIS) - At the end of his general audience today, the Pope mentioned his recent decision to revoke the excommunication on “the four bishops ordained without pontifical mandate by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1988”.

“I have undertaken this act of paternal benevolence because those same bishops have repeatedly expressed to me their profound suffering at the situation in which they found themselves.

“I hope that this gesture of mine will be followed by a prompt commitment on their part to take the further steps necessary to achieve full communion with the Church, thus showing true faithfulness to, and true recognition of, the Magisterium and authority of the Pope and of Vatican Council II”.

Unfortunately, Rev. Williamson was one of those included. and he obviously doesn’t think in the same way as other members of the Catholic Church hierarchy.

Posted by John Ross on 01/30/09 at 04:53 PM

Add Comment

Name: 

Email:  

Remember my personal information

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Subscribe To This Blog

You can follow Neil Rubin's blog by subscribing to the RSS feed here.

If you would like to have the latest blog posts delivered to your inbox enter your email address below:

email address:


Most Recent Entries
Strange Progress
Newt Gingrich and The Jews
Will Egypt Attack Israel?
How Obama Muffed It With American Jews—And Seeks To Recover
How Anti-Jewish Are Americans?
How U.S. Jews Can Make Abbas Mean It
Peres’ Spinning Ben-Gurion And Himself
Gilad Shalit And Us
American Jews And Israel’s Black Eye
God’s In The Hallway
Rick Perry, Jesus And The GOP
Change Tisha B’Av
Good News On Settlements—Maybe
What if Syria’s Assad Does Lose Power?
The End Of ‘The Christian Mission To The Jews”?
Most Popular Entries
Sharansky’s New Job
Obama’s ‘Just War’ And The Jews
Jews And The Bris Of Jesus
More Realistic Obama?
Rabbi Mark G. Loeb’s Funeral
Meet Zionism’s Replacement
The Passion Of ‘Christians United For Israel’
The Rise Of Ethical Kashrut
Message To EU: Why Negotiate?
Anti-Semitic Monkeys?
How To Embrace Islam
Palestinian Democracy At Work
Rush Limbaugh’s Mouth
Praying For Wiccans
Catholic Progress
Monthly Archives
March 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008