Check out their link as well.

May 4, 2012

Urgent Alert - Columbia Gas Proposing Construction of Major Gas Pipeline Through Owings Mills, Greenspring Valley, Falls Road Corridor, and Northern Baltimore County

Pipeline Threatens Environment, Wildlife, and Individual Homes Across Area

From Senator Bobby Zirkin, Delegates Jon Cardin, Dan Morhaim & Dana Stein

Dear Friend,

We are writing to alert you to a proposal by Columbia Gas to construct a major natural gas pipeline through many parts of our District.  The route being proposed by this Corporation may have serious impact on many of our homes, communities, and natural environments in the 11th District.  We are writing to you with serious concerns and urge you to educate yourself about this project.

A number of constituents and community organizations have raised questions about the impact of this project.  We are working to insure that everyone is as fully informed as possible and that citizens know where to raise those concerns.

The proposed pipeline by Columbia Gas would involve digging ditches across a 21 mile path, impacting over 300 acres, following a path of their current line which was built many decades ago.  Columbia is not required to follow this path.  Construction of this magnitude would impact natural environments in its path, necessitate clearing of trees and vegetation, cross streams and wetlands, and impact wildlife.  Although lobbyists from Columbia Gas assure that they will mitigate damage, we are not convinced of this.  Environmental impacts could be severe and long-term.

Further, the project will have a serious impact on property rights and individual homes.  If approved, Columbia can add an additional 25 foot easement on properties.  This means that Columbia would essentially take for their own an additional 25 feet of someone’s property.  Citizens will be forced to deal with many months of heavy construction throughout our area.  Homes may be forced to deal with the loss of forest and the natural environment.  If the project is approved by FERC, citizens could be forced to remove structures such as playgrounds and decks.  Citizens may face the choice of being paid money for the removal of such structures or eminent domain.

We are not at all persuaded that this project is necessary.  Even assuming that a line is necessary, we believe that any line should be built with minimal impact on the environment and the community.  In addition, we believe that to date, the process followed by Columbia Gas has, at best, met a minimal standard of transparency.
 
Please take the time to educate yourself and your community on this issue.  Whether you are personally affected or not by the specific route, we all share in the tremendous value of our beautiful environment and community and we should be united in this effort.
 
Columbia Gas must make application through the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the national agency that regulates interstate energy matters.  We are working hard to understand how state and local governments, community organizations, and citizens can impact those decisions.
 
It is important to send written comments to FERC.  They may be sent to:  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Attn: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, 888 First St. NE, Room 1A, Washington, D.C. 20426.  You can also comment on line at http://www.FERC.gov and follow the link to “Documents and Filings.”  There is an “eFiling” link that may be followed.  In any comment, reference Docket Number PF12-6.  This is critical as comments must be filed by May 16 in order to be taken into account in the “pre-filing period.”
 
There are two meetings scheduled on this issue where you may offer testimony as well as learn details.  The first is May 8 at 7:00 pm at Oregon Ridge Lodge, 13401 Beaver Dam Road, Cockeysville, MD 21030.  The second is May 9 at 7:00 pm at Youth’s Benefit Elementary School Cafeteria in Fallston.
 
Because FERC is a federal agency, we recommend contacting your federal officials.  Please contact Congressman John Sarbanes (202-225-4016), Dutch Ruppersberger (202-225-3061), Elijah Cummings (202-225-4741), or Andy Harris (202-225-5311), depending on where you live.  And also contact U.S. Senators Ben Cardin (202-224-4524) and Barbara Mikulski (202-224-4654).
 
Columbia Gas fully intends on moving forward with this major new gas pipeline in our community if FERC allows them to do so.  Note that this is for gas transmission only and it will not provide any benefit to our community in any way.  Your utility bills will not go down as a result of this project at all.  Constructing the line in the heart of our area will have serious impact from Owings Mills to Greenspring Valley to the Falls Road Corridor to Cockeysville to Northern Baltimore County to Fallston.
 
As this is a federal interstate project, it is unclear what impact our efforts will have.  But we believe it is critical to try to influence this process before FERC grants approval and it is too late.

Sincerely,

Senator Bobby Zirkin
Delegate Jon Cardin
Delegate Dan Morhaim
Delegate Dana Stein

BJEN held the Jewish community’s first electronic recycling event three years ago. Since then, we have helped safely recycled literally tons - mountains! - of materials that have now become part of our culture’s technological recycling stream (parallel to nature’s recycling stream).

We are very proud that now, several congregations are sponsoring their own community recycling events.

This Sunday, check out Beth El’s electronic recycling (E-cycling) and document shredding event.

Shredder Truck & Ecycle
Sunday, May 6
Back Parking Lot at Beth El Congregation
9:00 a.m. - 12 noon

$10 processing donation is requested.

Shabbat shalom!

“Midrash” is the ancient rabbinic technique of taking tantalizing verses in the Bible and creatively unfolding and reshaping them, tucking them a bit here and tweaking them a bit there, until voila, a new meaning emerges that is deftly applied to the author’s rhetorical purpose.

The text this morning comes from such a midrash on Ecclesiastes 7:13.

“Consider all that God has done: Who can make straight what he has made crooked?”

The text’s meaning is clear. It proclaims: How powerful God is! No one and nothing can countermand his word. Yet, along came a rabbi of old who decided that he could tweak the verse just a touch – changing the meaning of just one word – and thus teach an important lesson. In doing so, he created the midrash that has become the anthem of the Jewish environmental movement today.

Why, this anonymous rabbi-of-old asked, would the God of goodness make something crooked, twisted, broken?

Rather, the verse must be referring at the end not to God, but to man: “Consider all that God has done: who will be able to straighten again that which he – mankind - makes crooked?”

With this one change in mind, from “he” meaning “God”, to “he”  meaning man, the rabbi creates the following story:

“When the Holy One, blessed be He, created the first human, He took him by the hand and led him around the garden, showing him all the trees. 

God said to the human, ‘See all my works, how good and beautiful they are? Know that all I have created, I created for you. But be mindful that you do not spoil and destroy My world - for if you do, there will be no one after you to set it right.”

This is a stunning sixth-century rabbinic warning that teaches us that as big and magnificent and divinely-wrought as the natural world is, it is not indestructible, not immune to degradation by human hands.

The midrash teaches us that all creation, in all its detail, in all its particularity, is God’s work, glorious but vulnerable. Like a proud artist giving a tour of their studio, God took the human by the hand and showed him each and every tree and animal and stream and hill and the ways they all fit together.

And the human was told, all this is for you! All this I did for you! Remember, it is not impervious to harm, or steeled against ruin. It is the work that I love. Be sure to treat it well.

Note that the midrash notably and I would argue intentionally does not say: “All this I give to you.”  It rather says: “All this I made for you.” This world is here for us to cherish, and use, and even improve. The human is to acknowledge it, admire it, be humbled and grateful and awed by it. It is ours to live fully with, but it is not ours to possess.

As big and magnificent and important as we humans are, we need to be humble about our place in creation. We have been given great power, and great latitude in how we use that power. We need to be mindful and deliberate and discerning so that we use our knowledge, our appetites, our curiosity, and our power for good and not for evil, for growth and not destruction.

Along with this message, it seems to me that this story is pointing to yet something a bit deeper: that in the biblical imagination, nature is not just a gift, or commodity, or necessary accessory to the good life.  It is the very currency, the language, that God uses to speak with humanity. And therefore, it is the currency and language that we should use to speak back to God.

In the Bible – if we are good and God is pleased, the rains are soft and timely and come in just the right amount. If we are good and God is pleased, the land is blessed and giving; the harvests are bountiful and filling.

If we are not good and God is not pleased, the rain is hard and damaging, or sparse or absent; the land is parched and unyielding; the harvests are meager.

Deuteronomy 11 says:

(13) If you faithfully obey the commands I am giving you today—to love the LORD your God and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul— 14 then I will send rain on your land in its season, both autumn and spring rains, so that you may gather in your grain, new wine and olive oil. 15 I will provide grass in the fields for your cattle, and you will eat and be satisfied.

But if not, if (16) … you will be enticed to turn away and worship other gods and bow down to them. 17 Then the LORD’s anger will burn against you, and he will shut up the heavens so that it will not rain and the ground will yield no produce, and you will soon perish from the good land the LORD is giving you. 18

We tend to dismiss these words as quaint, outdated theological beliefs of cause and affect.  After all, we moderns don’t believe as the ancients did – we know droughts and floods, extreme weather and climate change don’t come as punishment from God in response to our bad moral behavior.

Perhaps not. But it is true that our behaviors affect the natural world, that how we manage and manipulate the environment determines the abundance, availability, health and distribution of the goodness of the natural world.

It’s true that hording and wasting, taking too much and returning too little, poisoning and trashing our waters, our land and our air upsets the ebb and flow of nature and the very systems we depend on.

So, while the Bible speaks of the necessity living in good relation to God, we can extrapolate that to mean living in good relation to God’s world. That is what the midrash is teaching. Whether through theology or natural law, failure to respect the vibrancy, integrity and moral laws of nature will bring havoc to the earth and all its inhabitants. And it is we humans who will be held responsible. And, as the midrash says, there will be no one after us to set it right. And it is in the way we treat nature that our devotion to God is measured and weighed.

The midrash continues with a haunting vision:

To what might this be likened, it asks:

To a woman who is pregnant and gives birth in jail. The child is raised in jail; grows up in jail, and his mother dies in jail.  One day, the king was travelling by the jail, and as he passed by the son shouts out to him and says: Oh King: it was in this prison that I was born, and it is here that I was raised, and here I live: but I ask you, by what sin have I earned this punishment of being here? And the King answers, Because your mother gave birth to you here.”

If we destroy the world, if we create out of it a prison of destruction, we curse our children with living in that destruction. That is something we cannot do.

How do we avoid it? In the very first chapters of the Bible, we read a phrase, a formula, that helps guide us in the task of living well with God’s gift, and of avoiding the fate we dare not bring about.

In Chapter Two of Genesis, in the story of the creation of Adam, the Bible tells us that:

“The LORD God took the man he had made and put him in the Garden of Eden “to work it and care for it.”

It is in this pairing of verbs, this yin/yang of purpose, this balance of consumer and protector; manipulator and preserver, that the vision of how humans should and must relate to the earth is revealed and measured.

L’ovdah ul’shomrah. To till and to tend; to work and protect. These are not to be seen as two separate, sequential tasks, doing one now and the other later: mountaintop removal here and preserving the Tetons there. Our agriculture, manufacturing, energy production, recycling, waste disposal all must be a piece of preserving and not just consuming. That is the message of living right in the Bible. That is the message we in the faith community must know and speak.

This, then, is the task of the faith community:

·    To live in sync with the flow and pulse and patterns of the world

·    To live humbly and joyously with God’s awesome gift

·    To advance and preserve the work of creation

·    To be witness to the truth that living our lives this way is a most blessed and purposeful way to be.

·    And to teach the lessons of the midrash to our neighbors and children, our businessmen and politicians, our farmers and bankers, and to ourselves, saying:

‘See all God’s work, how good and beautiful it is? Know that all God created, he created for us. But we must be mindful that we do not spoil and destroy it - for if we do, there will be no one after us to set it right.”

I like that view and have taught that in years past.

But I am thinking of hametz in a slightly different way this year. What if we thought of hametz not as bad, but as “dirt”?

Mary Douglas, the eminent anthropologist (of Purity and Danger fame), taught that “dirt” was not a thing but a concept, not an essence but an attribution. Dirt is not something that can be scientifically catalogued the way pathogens or bacteria are. You cannot put something under a microscope to see if it is “dirt” or not.

“Dirt” is stuff out of place, something existing where somebody thinks it shouldn’t. Just as a weed is a plant growing where you don’t want it, so dirt is something being where you don’t want it.

This explains a lot. It explains why, for example, when there are clothes all over your son’s bedroom floor, you may think the place is “dirty” while he thinks the clothes are just arrayed on the biggest shelf in the room. Or why a child’s hair-clippings found in a mother’s keepsake box are precious whereas that same hair found on the bathroom floor is a mess.

Which helps me - and challenges me - when I think of hametz.

What is the right place, and time, for things? Why are things that were perfectly good for us yesterday forbidden to us today? How did this thing that is a staple of life on other occasions become so virulent on Passover that it must be totally banished, or at least nullified and transformed?

Perhaps, as Avram suggests, it is a matter of degree. A bit of pride, a bit of ambition, a bit of selfishness is not bad. They are even essential. How else do we build and discover and push beyond contemporary limits without the urgings of ambition or pride, or genuine curiosity? But what dangers lie, as well, in uncontrolled pride, greed and voyeurism? And where do we draw the lines?

Perhaps Pesah is that annual season of line-drawing, re-setting the boundaries, of cleaning out the expanding, crusty accretions of too much pride, too much desire. Perhaps Pesah should be seen as a radical reboot, a cleansing that offers a stark exercise trimming back the excess and re-evaluating the value that guides these impulses. What, Pesah might be asking us, are all those urgings for? What service should we properly put them to?

Perhaps that, too, is why Pesah is a week long. We could not bear to strip ourselves of our protective coatings, rid ourselves of the armor of pride, and return, so exposed, to the unchanged rigors and dangers of the world. We need a week to live in this pristine world of the wilderness, in the company of each other, in a taste of a place where all is in balance, where manna comes with the dew, where the world protects us. We need a week to take in this gift of freedom, to bask unafraid in the presence of each other, to understand where - when we return to the world of hametz - we should direct the power of our urgings.

And then, with that as our armor, return to tangle, or tango, with hametz.

It seems like a perfect time to muse, for a moment, about the place of rain, geshem, in the rabbinic imagination, and how it morphed from the realm of physics to the world metaphysics.

Gashmiut (from geshem) is how the medieval rabbis referred to life’s “physicality,” the earthy, material dimension of this created world. It is juxtaposed to Ruchniut, the non-corporeal, spiritual dimension.

You won’t find Gashmiut in the Bible. You won’t find it in the Talmud. It was a word formed by our medieval ancestors to encompass one half of their world-view divided into two: “stuff” on one side and “essence” on the other.

The choice of Ruchniut is clear. Ruach is wind, breath, the intangible but enduring essence of life as expressed in Genesis 1:2 “the ruach of God fluttered over the waters.” It is a fine root for spirituality.

But the choice of geshem, rain, is curious. It seems the opposite of substance.  Episodic, fluid, impossible to hold, “raininess” hardly seems to convey the sense of sturdy “materiality”.  A stronger candidate might have been “earth,” adamah. Earthiness powerfully carries the meaning of physicality, groundedness, something solid and enduring.

“Even” or “tzur,” stone and rock, could have conveyed an even better sense of sturdiness, physical presence. It was good enough to serve as a metaphor for the reality, presence and steadfastness of the Divine. And its hard substantiality contrasts nicely with spirituality.

But the medieval philosophers didn’t choose those. They chose geshem, rain, instead. I haven’t yet found a study that explains why, so I take the opportunity to muse. (I haven’t nailed this one yet so your guidance and responses would be most welcome.)

What are the material dimensions of rain that the rabbis wished to emphasize as the essence of physical life? It is not possessiveness. Rain neither owns things nor can it be owned. It cannot be held long in the hand or carved or mined. And though we can gather it in cisterns and guide it through water races, we cannot possess the rain, only the pools in which it gathers. There is something, then, mercurial, evanescent, otherly and fragile about it.

Yet, rain is powerfully, desperately desired, but only at the right time and only in the right amounts. In its parts, it is insubstantial. Drop by drop it amounts to little. Single drops do not make rain; single drops do not bring life. It takes a cloudburst to make a rainfall. And it takes a rainfall to bring life. Too much, though, and life is destroyed.

Captured and horded, it can go stagnant and stink. It is through its flow, when it is shared among the land and trees and streams that it is vibrant and yields life.

Rain is, in the rabbinic imagination, the major currency between God and humans. It comes from the heavens and descends upon the earth. It is stored in the vaults on high and released in its time as blessing or curse. It captures the mystery and majesty of God’s hold over all nature.

So, what does all this tell us about ourselves? What does this tell us about our bodies as material husks and our desires for material possessions and well-being?

What does it tell us about one and many, enough and not too much, having and sharing? And what, in the end, does it tell us about the rabbis’ sense of purpose and the world’s best way of being?

There is, as always, something ever more interesting in the curious than in the obvious.  I am eager to hear what you think.

Right on time, the peepers have returned.

They greeted me after megillah reading last night, singing their chorus of longing into the soft, warm March air.

Well, one did at any rate. It was, as usual, a lonesome call of an avant-garde male, out before the rest, desperately hoping that at least one of the pond’s she-frogs has emerged from her hibernation seeking a long-delayed, refreshing, gratifying tryst.

It is a daring audition. But then again, pioneers are, by definition, singular folk, carried aloft and ahead by their visions and passion, fueled by the same breath that gives wing to their song. If they are right, or lucky, or both, their solo turns into a rousing, transporting chorus that lifts the spirit and well-being of all. So it promises again to be for this little fellow, and his awakening cohort of lovers.

In 2008, they emerged around March 5. In 2009, around March 7. Last year, no doubt the same time (I came back from Cambridge around Purim-time and heard the peepers in full chorus then). I know because I mentioned them in this blog.

The cycles of the seasons are comforting, reassuring. It seems prudent to give up all expectations of a late-winter blistering blizzard (I will shelve that hope and dust it off next winter). But that disappointment is soothed by the peeking out of spring crocuses and daffodils, the heightening chatter of birds, the lengthening of daylight (growing by a hefty 2.5 minutes a day!) and the spring leap of the clock this weekend.

One more sign that spring is pressing hard to come: sunrise is no longer visible from my south-easterly-facing study.  It is time, then, to retire my snow-starved boots, crank up the compost, clean out and close up the forlorn wood-burning stove, shed the pleasures of cozily hunkering down and ramp up for the joys of ... Passover preparations.

The trees of life and the knowledge of good and evil in the Book of Genesis were not pine or poplar or cypress. They were fruit trees. The dove did not bring back an ash leaf or elm bough but an olive branch.

The laws of the Torah that urge us to avoid waste and limit what we disturb in the process of building, come from the command not to destroy fruit trees in the pursuit of war.  Other trees may be made into battlements and weapons of war, but not fruit trees. In a time of siege, in a time of such need, fruit trees may not be destroyed or harvested for their wood.

The lesson: we may not destroy what we will need tomorrow in response to the desperations of today.

The rabbis extended this preferential treatment of fruit trees.

They asked, why does the Torah (Exodus 26:15) require the pillars of the Tabernacle be made out of acacia wood? To teach us a lesson. Though God could have chosen any tree for the construction of the Tabernacle, God chose the acacia, a tree with no beneficial fruit or product save the wood itself.

So too, we humans, when selecting wood to build our homes, should not choose a fruit tree. To do otherwise would engage in discretionary, avoidable destruction.

It is not hard to extract a more global message: in the act of building civilization, we must uproot bits of nature. That is unavoidable. But we should do so only with the most efficient of materials, the least disruptive of methods, and in ways that allow us to be nurtured as much tomorrow as we are today.

This summer, it is in Israel If you are interested, check out the information below.

Siach: An Environment and Social Justice Conversation

Applications for 2012 conference are open!

WHAT:  A unique opportunity to meet, share and collaborate with fellow social justice and environment activists from across the Jewish world.  Siach, an Environment and Social Justice Conversation, brings together committed activists from across Israel, North America, and Europe. Supported by the UJA Federation of New York, with anchors in the US, Israel and Great Britain, and scores of member organizations, Siach is deepening the nuanced understanding of Jewish Peoplehood and Israel engagement with those for whom the pursuit of social and environmental justice is one of the defining characteristics of their identity.

WHERE:  The second annual Siach conference will take place in Ohalo Manor Hotel, on the Kinneret in Israel.

WHEN: June 15-18, 2012

WHO:  We are looking for individuals who are doers, networkers, out-of-the-box thinkers and visionaries with the desire to share our vision of creating a global network of collaboration in the areas of environment and social justice.

Stipends up to $1200 are available.

Click here for more information and to apply.

So, like the native New Yorker he is,  he put the excess furniture out on the curb. Three hours later, it was gone. I had earlier seen a man on the street stop, set his briefcase down beside my son’s flotsam (or more properly, jetsam), call someone to describe his find to, all the while assuming that protective, this-is-mine-don’t-even-think-about-it stance.

When I went back outside a half hour later, the furniture, and the man, were gone.  You gotta love New York.

It handily solves one of life’s persistent questions: What to do with things we don’t want, perfectly good things that too often find their way to the trash, or clutter up our otherwise perfectly fine homes, all because we don’t know how to properly get rid of them.

Thankfully, more and more, across the world, we are re-creating the best of New York City’s casual street trade in a more organized, yet equally robust recycling, re-using, and re-purposing marketplace.

I recently read about Bookcrossing.com,  a way to recycle your books, track where they go and see who else reads them in a worldwide book-sharing community. (You go to the site, download bookcrossing ID labels, slap them on the books you want to give away, and then either release them into the wind or register them on the site for others to request).

There is of course the old standby, Freecycle.org, the local on-line neighbor-to-neighbor free marketplace that allows you to post stuff you want to give away and find stuff you want to get. It is, according to their website, made up of “5,022 groups with 8,878,732 members around the world.” Pretty impressive. And you can get anything from open bags of kitty litter to living room suites.

Baltimore also has our very own Loading Dock, a national model for re-cycling and re-using building and construction materials. You can get or donate windows, appliances, flooring, paint, most anything that is still in good working order that you would otherwise have to pay to haul away. (Baltimore County, at least, does not collect construction debris in its trash or recycling rounds.)

And there are of course the old stand-bys: flea markets and garage sales.

There are some folks who worry about lost manufacturing jobs and a hit to the economy that such re-use might have. The truth is, as long as the population is still growing, we will need more - not just re-used - stuff. But we also know that we cannot keep digging things out of the earth for materials and energy and think that is the best way to give people jobs.

Re-cycling and re-purposing can also be a growing jobs sector. Someone has to drive the trucks and manage the inventory and keep the books and do the advertising; and someone has to demolish the old and rebuild the new.

What is wonderful about many, if not most, of these enterprises, is that they start out home-grown, work through the affordable services of the internet, and build community at the same time. They don’t take an MBA or lots of start-up capital. They take passion, caring and faith in the goodwill of people.

I do have one question though: What do people do with their old, shabby clothes? Not the kind that you can give away to Goodwill or take to the Hadassah re-sale shop. And certainly not the kind that you can sell via a consignment shop.

I mean those socks with holes and t-shirts that are threadbare… those things that years ago might have been made into rag rugs or used to clean silver.

I have enough cleaning rags, thank you. And we have enough quilting squares to keep my daughter busy for years. So the question remains, how do we recycle fabric that otherwise just goes into the landfills? Old kitchen towels, underwear, totally unwearable and unsaleable stuff hanging in closets.

If you have an answer, or better, a vendor, who can solve this dilemma for me, please do let me know.

I will gladly share the advice.